PBN backlinks: October 2026

Monday, 12 October 2026

SIR Stay, Action Against Officials: Rahul Gandhi's 10 Requests To Top Court

Opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, along with hundreds of supporters, reached the Supreme Court, seeking an interim stay on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and alleged poll irregularities. While the Leader of Opposition reached the Supreme Court in the evening, an hour or two earlier, the Congress legal team filed a petition at the top court, demanding ten forms of relief regarding the SIR and other decisions taken by the Election Commission.

Since Rahul Gandhi could not reach the Supreme Court before the 4:30 pm deadline, the petition was filed by lawyer S Prasanna.

Besides Rahul Gandhi, Congress party chief Mallikarjun Kharge, Priyanka Gandhi, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, Trinamool chief Mamata Banerjee and RJD's Tejashwi Yadav were among a host of leaders who joined the massive INDIA bloc march today. Yesterday, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant had refused to meet Rahul Gandhi, stating that the matter is sub judice. Following this, Opposition leaders filed a joint plea in the Supreme Court.

One of the principal demands of the Opposition is the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

NDTV accessed the details of the petition which has been listed as 'Rahul Gandhi v. Election Commission of India' on the Supreme Court website.
What The Petition Says

1. Directive To Produce All Records Related To The SIR

A directive should be issued to the Election Commission of India to submit to the Court all complete files, agreements, minutes, meeting records, and records of objections related to the disputed Special Intensive Revision (SIR). This must include relevant ECINET and ERONET access logs and complete file notings pertaining to the decision to initiate the SIR on June 24, 2025.

This directive should be issued to safeguard rights under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution and to enforce Article 324.

READ | Rahul Gandhi Leads Massive Rally In Delhi. Then A Supreme Court Visit

2. Examination Of The Constitutional Validity Of SIR Decisions

An appropriate order should be issued to examine whether the disputed decisions regarding the Special Intensive Revision comply with Article 324 of the Constitution, Section 18 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, and the principles laid down by this Court in the T.N. [case]... ...whether they have been taken in accordance with the law laid down in the Seshan v. Union of India (1995) case.

If any decision was taken without proper statutory authority, it should be set aside.

READ | Delhi Protest LIVE: Rahul Gandhi, INDIA Bloc Leaders Reach Supreme Court

3. Action Against Responsible Officials

Directions should be issued to take appropriate action against persons responsible for any violation of constitutional or statutory provisions governing the preparation and revision of electoral rolls.

This should also include action under Section 32 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, where necessary.

READ | "Why A Hindi Name?": DMK Takes On Congress Over Rahul Gandhi's "Chhatron Ka Goonj"

4. Redressal Of The Petitioner's Grievances

The Election Commission should be directed to take an appropriate decision on the current petition and related matters, and to ensure that every decision of the Election Commission regarding the SIR is taken in accordance with Section 18 of the 2023 Act and duly recorded.

5. Directive To Align Online Form-6 With Prescribed Rules

The Election Commission should be directed to ensure that the online Form-6 conforms to the form prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. No changes deviating from the prescribed form should be made unless the rules are duly amended following the applicable procedure.

READ | 'Rahul Gandhi vs Election Commission': Supreme Court Hearing Likely Tomorrow

6. Demand For An Audit By An Independent Committee

An independent committee should be constituted under the chairmanship of a retired Supreme Court judge. It should also include technical experts and eminent citizens.

The committee should be entrusted with the following tasks within a stipulated timeframe:

To conduct an independent inquiry and audit regarding the deletion of names from and amendments to the electoral rolls during the SIR

To examine access to the electoral roll database and the changes made therein.

This should also include ECINET and ERONET.

To conduct a comprehensive review of the technical design and architecture regarding decisions, policies, procedures, protocols, and the use and deployment of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs).

To take into account global best practices with the aim of ensuring free and fair elections.

READ | Opinion | Rahul Gandhi Has Found The Streets Again. And The BJP, An Unexpected 'Opening'

7. Directive To Make Public Names And Reasons For Deletion Of Voters During SIR

The Election Commission should be directed to publish, on a booth-wise basis, the names of all voters deleted from the electoral roll during the SIR.

Along with this, the following details should also be made public:

The reason for the deletion of each voter's name.

Classification of deleted names based on gender and age.

An effective and functional mechanism for the re-inclusion of voters who are found eligible to be on the electoral roll.

READ | "Supreme Court Doors Open": Chief Justice On Saying No To INDIA Bloc Meeting

8. Directive Not To Delete Any Voter's Name Without Notice And Hearing

The respondents should be directed not to delete any voter's name from the electoral roll without serving notice as per the law and without providing a reasonable opportunity for a hearing.

Furthermore, in Punjab and other states where elections are due, eligible persons should be permitted to apply for the inclusion of their names in the electoral roll up to the cut-off date prescribed by law.

READ | 'Haven't Yet Examined Form 6': Supreme Court On Bihar SIR Petition

9. Demand For Interim Stay On Ongoing SIR Process

An interim directive should be issued to suspend the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) across all states until the issues raised in the present petition are considered and adjudicated.

This demand is made with the aim of protecting the rights of eligible voters and upholding the fairness and integrity of the electoral process.

READ | Day Before INDIA Bloc March, Chief Justice Surya Kant Says No To Meeting: Sources

10. Demand For Issuance Of Other Orders Deemed Appropriate By Court

It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court pass any other or additional orders -- considering the facts and circumstances of the case -- that it deems appropriate and necessary to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process and the voting rights of every eligible citizen.

Delhi Police De-Notifies Jantar Mantar As Designated Protest Site, Three New Venues Announced

Delhi Police De-Notifies Jantar Mantar As Designated Protest Site, Three New Venues Announced

Listen to this Article

The Delhi Police on Monday (October 12) announced the de-notification of Jantar Mantar as a designated protest site, following recommendation by a committee formed by Ministry of Home Affairs.

As per a Standing Order on Guideline For Holding Protests of Demonstrations in Delhi issued by Delhi Police Commissioner Anurag Kumar, MHA had constituted a committee to examine an alternative proper venues for holding/organizing protests in place of the existing designated site.

"Based on the Committee's recommendation, Jantar Mantar as a protest venue has been de-notified. Three new venues Ramlila Ground, Burari Ground and CBD Ground East Delhi have been designated as new venues for organizing protests/demonstrations" the SO states.

It further states that a detailed SOP for organizing protests/demonstrations at these three venues will be issued separately.

Notably last week the Supreme Court had asked the Centre to consider whether another location should be designated for peaceful protests in place of Jantar Mantar, considering the suggestion that an alternative venue equipped with adequate amenities for protesters needs to be identified.

The Court passed the direction after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Court that the competent authority would consider designating a place other than Jantar Mantar for peaceful protests, and requested to record the statement in the order. The SG said that Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal was also agreeable to the suggestion.

Sunday, 11 October 2026

Understanding High-DA Profile Backlinks for Sustainable SEO Growth

Profile back links are links that might show up on user or company profiles developed on websites, neighborhoods, professional platforms, directories, or other on the internet services. They can aid develop links between a brand and appropriate online sources while providing one more pathway for customers and search engines to find a site.

The expression buy 100 DA 70+ account backlinks is typically related to search engine optimization services providing account placements on domains that advertise high authority metrics. Marketing professionals must comprehend that domain name authority is a third-party measurement and does not ensure better search positions.

Recognizing DA 70+ Profile Backlinks

DA, or Domain Authority, is a metric created by Moz to estimate the ranking toughness of a site. A domain with a DA rating of 70 or higher is normally thought about strong according to that particular statistics.

Look for buy DA 70+ profile backlinks commonly focus on obtaining profile links from sites with high mathematical authority. In a similar way, terms such as DA 70+ account backlinks and DA 70 account back links stress the desired authority threshold.

DA should not be considered an official search-engine ranking factor. Site significance, content quality, track record, website traffic, and editorial standards should also be assessed.

Why High DA Can Attract Attention

Marketing experts regularly search for buy high DA profile back links due to the fact that high-authority domain names can appear extra well-known and reputable. An account on a trusted site might additionally supply chances for brand name discovery, referral website traffic, and expert visibility.

The value of an account depends on the system itself. A genuine account that represents a genuine person, firm, or organization can be helpful for branding. On the other hand, creating various vacant profiles exclusively to create web links might provide little useful worth.

Because of this, services should think about the purpose and high quality of each account rather than focusing just on its DA rating.

Examining 100 Account Back Links

The phrase get 100 account backlinks explains a quantity-focused strategy to link building. While getting a a great deal of accounts might seem appealing, quantity does not instantly convert into stronger search engine optimization performance.

A collection of 100 DA 70+ backlinks can still have actually restricted worth if the links originate from unassociated websites, inactive platforms, duplicate account pages, or websites with poor-quality content. A smaller number of pertinent and genuine accounts might develop far better brand direct exposure.

Marketers should take a look at platform relevance, account credibility, indexability, target market quality, and total site credibility before considering a large package.

The Duty of High DA Profile Back Links

High DA profile backlinks can be component of a broader on the internet existence method when they are created naturally and on appropriate platforms. Expert companies, industry areas, service directory sites, and trusted platforms might enable firms to develop profiles consisting of helpful details. Browse through this site high DA profile backlinks ready to know a lot more.

These accounts can reinforce brand consistency by presenting precise business summaries, get in touch with info, proficiency, and links to appropriate resources. The main goal should be assisting customers find trustworthy information rather than adjusting search rankings.

Services ought to likewise maintain constant branding and prevent too much keyword-stuffed account summaries.

Producing a Lasting Link-Building Approach

Prior to choosing to buy 100 DA 70+ account back links, marketing experts should take into consideration whether the recommended positionings give authentic worth. Internet search engine discourage manipulative link schemes, and unnaturally generated backlink patterns can create search engine optimization risks.

A sustainable strategy can integrate legitimate accounts with content points out, digital PR, sector collaborations, specialist contributions, useful resources, and initial research study. These methods can produce varied resources of visibility while constructing real authority.

Ultimately, DA 70+ account backlinks must not be reviewed by their numerical statistics alone. Relevance, credibility, online reputation, context, and usefulness are equally important. By concentrating on quality rather than simply trying to buy 100 profile backlinks, companies can develop a more balanced and sturdy approach to search engine optimization and on-line brand name growth.

CJI Surya Kant declines Opposition leaders' request for meet over SIR, CEC Gyanesh Kumar; cites judicial propriety | India News

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant has declined a request by Opposition leaders to meet him on Monday, citing extensive reasons why such an interaction would not be appropriate at this juncture and in the present circumstances, dealing a setback to the Opposition’s plan to seek his intervention over the crackdown on a youth-led protest in Delhi and alleged irregularities in electoral processes.
The proposed meeting had not been confirmed by the CJI’s office when the Opposition announced its plans on Sunday. (File Photo/PTI)
The proposed meeting had not been confirmed by the CJI’s office when the Opposition announced its plans on Sunday. (File Photo/PTI)

Among the key reasons cited were the pendency of related matters before the Supreme Court in its judicial capacity and the CJI’s own adjudicatory role in petitions concerning these issues, people aware of the matter said.

Also Read | Opposition march to Supreme Court tomorrow; leaders seek to meet CJI against SIR, CEC Gyanesh Kumar

Opposition's meeting with CJI

The decision came hours after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi announced that they had sought time to meet the CJI between 4 pm and 5 pm on Monday. Kharge had said that he and Gandhi had written to the CJI, seeking an opportunity to apprise him of their concerns over the functioning of constitutional institutions and request his intervention.

The Opposition had planned to raise several issues, including the police action against protesters demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, the expeditious hearing of cases concerning the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and the composition of the committee that recommends appointments to the Election Commission.

The proposed meeting had not been confirmed by the CJI’s office when the Opposition announced its plans on Sunday. Kharge, speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, had said the delegation would place its concerns before the CJI with folded hands, adding that the leaders could not make demands of the head of the judiciary.

Also Read | After CJP, Opposition calls for protest, march to Supreme Court to demand action against SIR

“We have scheduled a meeting between 4 and 5 pm, during which we will apprise him (CJI) of the situation. We cannot demand anything from him, but we will place our concerns before him with folded hands and request his intervention,” Kharge had said.
Protests in Delhi

The CJI’s refusal comes against the backdrop of four days of Opposition demonstrations in Delhi, including protests near the Election Commission of India (ECI), a sit-in at Rajghat and an attempt to march to the poll panel’s office. Opposition leaders had also met President Droupadi Murmu to raise their concerns over the Election Commission’s functioning and alleged electoral irregularities.

Kharge on Sunday accused the Narendra Modi-led government of imposing an “undeclared Emergency” in the country, alleging that the heavy police deployment and detention of protesters reflected an attempt to suppress dissent.

“The Prime Minister and the Home Minister have created chaos across the country. An undeclared Emergency is prevailing, and we will continue to fight against it. We will continue our fight to protect democracy and the constitutional rights of the people,” he said.
March towards Supreme Court on Monday

Rahul Gandhi had separately announced a march towards the Supreme Court on Monday, calling on Opposition parties, young people and civil society groups to join the protest. He alleged that young people who had taken part in a peaceful demonstration in Delhi on Saturday were beaten by police and BJP supporters.

“Tomorrow, we will march to the Supreme Court as Indians, united beyond party, gender, caste, community and state. Youth, all opposition parties, civil society groups, all those who believe in democracy and stand by the Constitution of India, will walk with us,” Gandhi said.

Also Read | Opposition panel meets President Murmu, Rahul Gandhi says ‘vote chori’ proof sought

He had said the march would culminate in the submission of a memorandum to the CJI, seeking an end to alleged “vote chori”, the halting of SIR and the removal of Gyanesh Kumar as chief election commissioner. Gandhi also accused the government of attempting to intimidate those raising questions about electoral processes.
CJI’s inclusion in committee selecting election commissioners

The demand for the CJI’s inclusion in the committee selecting election commissioners is linked to a pending challenge to the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. Under the law, the selection committee comprises the Prime Minister, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a Union Cabinet minister nominated by the Prime Minister.

The 2023 law replaced an earlier arrangement laid down by the Supreme Court, under which the CJI was part of the selection committee until Parliament enacted a law governing appointments. The Opposition has argued that excluding the CJI undermines the independence of the Election Commission.

On September 23, a bench of justices Dipankar Datta and Satish Chandra Sharma delivered a split verdict on whether the challenge to the 2023 law should be referred to a Constitution bench. Justice Datta held that such a reference was unnecessary because the challenge could be decided on the basis of settled principles laid down in earlier judgments. Justice Sharma, however, favoured a five-judge bench, holding that the case raised substantial questions concerning the interpretation of the Constitution.

The Opposition’s proposed intervention also comes amid its continuing campaign against the SIR exercise and allegations of irregularities in electoral rolls. The Election Commission and the BJP have rejected allegations of deliberate manipulation of voter lists, maintaining that deletions during revision exercises can arise from factors such as deaths, migration and voters being untraceable.

Former Chhattisgarh chief minister and Congress leader Bhupesh Baghel had said that party MPs, MLAs and district presidents would travel to Delhi for Monday’s march. He alleged that the public mandate had been stolen through manipulation of electronic voting machines in some places and the removal of names from electoral rolls in others.

The Opposition’s efforts to escalate its campaign have drawn a mixed response from parties over the role of the youth-led Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), whose supporters have been at the centre of the recent protests. While some Opposition parties have expressed sympathy with the group’s concerns, the Congress has remained cautious about its participation in the planned march.

Friday, 9 October 2026

J D Vance calls H-1B workers 'indentured servants', accuses Microsoft of visa abuse

Vice President JD Vance announces the suspension of the PERM Program for Microsoft: "Thanks to an ongoing investigation, we have decided to suspend the PERM program for Microsoft, which means they will no longer be able to take those H-1Bs and apply for permanent resident status within the United States of America. Now our message to Microsoft and to any other foreign or domestic corporation is quite simple. We obviously want you to thrive in the United States of America. We want people to invest in the United States of America, particularly the American technology sector. We’re the biggest boosters of your industry. We want you to continue to grow and to employ a lot of people, but we want you to employ American workers. And so our message to Microsoft is, you’re great American company, but you’ve got to hire great American workers. You cannot lay off American workers and then replace them with foreign indentured servants."

UP Rajya Sabha Polls: 2 Nominations Rejected, BJP And SP Candidates Set For Unopposed Win

Two independent nominations were rejected in the UP Rajya Sabha polls, leaving eight BJP and two SP candidates set to win unopposed.

UP Rajya Sabha Elections: 2 Nominations Rejected, Outcome Becomes Clear UP Rajya Sabha Polls: 2 Nominations Rejected, BJP And SP Candidates Set For Unopposed Win

UP Rajya Sabha Polls: 2 Nominations Rejected, 10 Candidates Remain For 10 Seats.

The nomination papers of two independent candidates were rejected during scrutiny on Wednesday, clearing the way for eight BJP and two Samajwadi Party candidates to be elected unopposed to the Rajya Sabha from Uttar Pradesh. Returning Officer Ajeet Verma said the papers of Kante Syana and Onkar Nath Chaurasia were rejected for failing to meet mandatory requirements. With exactly 10 valid candidates remaining for 10 seats, polling scheduled for October 16 is unlikely to be required, unless there are withdrawals before the October 9 deadline.
10 Candidates, 10 Seats

The BJP candidates are Dharampal Singh, party OBC wing chief Prakash Pal, Shruti Gangwar, Vidya Sagar Sonkar, Priyanka Rawat, Radhakant Ojha, Gopi Krishna Pandey and Ram Pratap Singh Chauhan.

The SP has fielded veteran leader Ram Gopal Yadav and Reliance Industries executive Dhanraj Parimal Nathwani.

The terms of 10 Rajya Sabha members from Uttar Pradesh are ending on November 25, necessitating the biennial elections. However, with the number of valid candidates now matching the number of seats, all 10 are set to be declared elected unopposed if there are no withdrawals.

Also Read: Mithun Chakraborty Appointed Cabinet-Rank Adviser To West Bengal Government’s Cultural Affairs Department

BJP’s New Faces

The BJP has fielded an entirely new set of candidates, with none of its eight outgoing Rajya Sabha members from Uttar Pradesh being renominated. The list includes Union ministers Hardeep Puri and BL Verma, who have not been given another nomination from the state.

The BJP’s eight nominees include two women and represent different caste groups and regions, with the selections coming months ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

The SP had earlier been expected by some to field a third candidate and force a contest for the 10th seat. However, party chief Akhilesh Yadav ended that speculation on Tuesday, saying, “Now, our focus is not on three, but on 403,” referring to the 403-member Uttar Pradesh Assembly.

If all 10 seats had gone to a contest, a candidate would have needed at least 37 first-preference votes from MLAs to secure a seat. With the current numbers, however, the October 16 polling date is expected to become unnecessary.